Ir al contenido principal

Un vistazo al capitalismo de la China roja


Today's selection -- from Red Capitalism by Carl E. Walter and Fraser J.T. Howie.

 In 1978, the entire city of Beijing was barely able to scrape together $38,000 to send their leader Deng Xiaoping to the United Nations. Today, China's stock markets are the largest in Asia:

"30 years ago China was barely able to pull itself up off the floor where it had been knocked flat by the Cultural Revolution. Beijing in 1978 was a fully depreciated version of the city in 1949 minus the great city walls, which had all been torn down and turned into workers' shanties and bomb shelters. 

"Deng Xiaoping, during his first, brief, political resurrection in 1974, led a large Chinese delegation to a special session of the United Nations. This was a huge step for China in lifting the self-imposed isolation that prevailed during the Cultural Revolution. Just before departing for New York, the entire central government, so the story goes, made a frantic search through all the banks in Beijing for funds to pay for the trip. The cupboard was bare: they could scrape together only US$38,000. This was to be the first time a supreme leader of China, virtually the Last Emperor, had visited America; if he couldn't afford first-class international travel, just where was the money to support China's economic development to come from?

"[Now] China's stock markets are the biggest in Asia, with many of the world's largest companies, and more than 120 million separate accounts trading stocks in nearly 1,800 companies. Their capital-raising abilities are the stuff of legend (see Table 6.1). According to data from Bloomberg, since January 2006, half of the world's top 10 IPOs were chinese companies raising over US$45 billion. It is not uncommon for new issues in Shanghai to be 500 times oversubscribed, with more than US$400 billion pledged for a single offering. The scale of China's companies since 1990 has increased exponentially. In 1996, the total market capitalization of the top 10 listed companies in Shanghai was US$17.9 billion. By year-end 1999, this was US$25.3 billion and, ten years later, $1.063 trillion! Like everything else about China, the simple scale of these offerings and the growth they represent at times seems staggering. ...

"In the 1980s, China's stock markets arose for the same reasons as stock markets in Western private economies: small, private, and state-owned companies were starved of capital and small household investors were seeking a return. The idea of using shares to raise money sprang up simultaneously in many parts of the country and, given the relaxed political atmosphere of the times, the ideas were allowed to take shape. ... The key year was 1987, when five Shenzhen [state owned enterprises] offered shares to the public. Shenzhen Development Bank (SDB), China's first financial institution (and first major SOE) limited by shares, led off in May and was followed in December by Yanke, now a leading property developer. Their IPOs were undersubscribed and drew no interest. The retail public's indifference to SDB 's IPO even forced the Party organization in Shenzhen to mobilize its members to buy shares. Despite this support, only 50 percent of its issue was subscribed.

"The fact is that after more than 30 years of central planning, near-civil war and state ownership, the understanding of what exactly an equity share was had been lost in the mists of pre-revolution history. Where securities called 'shares' existed, investors thought of them as valuable only for the dividends paid; people bought them to hold for the cash flow. There was no awareness that shares might appreciate (or depreciate) in value, and so yield up a capital gain (or loss). So the market was understandably tepid for the bank's IPO and it was also unprepared for events that followed payment of the first dividend in early 1989.

"The SDB's dividend announcement in early 1989 marked a major turning point in China's economic history, and it should be recognized as such. The bank was very generous, awarding its shareholders -- largely state and Party investors -- a cash dividend of RMB10 per share and a two-for-one stock dividend. In the blink of an eye, those who had bought the bank's shares in 1988 for about RMB20 enjoyed a profit several times their original investment. ... People got the point: shares were worth something more than simple face value. As this news spread in Shenzhen, a fire began to blaze. the bank's shares, as well as the few other stocks available, skyrocketed in wild street trading. SDB's shares jumped from a year-end price of RMB40 to RMB120 just before June 4, 1989, and despite the political trouble up north, ended the year at RMB90.

"Armed with this new insight, China's retail investors set off a period of share fever, centering on Shenzhen and gradually extending to Shanghai and other cities such as Chengdu, Wuhan, and Shenyang, where shares were traded. In the end, Beijing forced local governments to take steps to cool things down. Restrictions eventually took hold, leading to a market collapse in late 1990. Even so, investors had learned the lesson of equity investing: stocks can appreciate."


Red Capitalism: The Fragile Financial Foundation of China's Extraordinary Rise
Author: Carl Walter
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Copyright 2012, 2011 John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Pages 2-3, 164, 168-169


Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Pepe Mujica mató a un policía por la espalda

Contra Pepe Mujica Todos lo alaban por sus “frases profundas”, por su aspecto humilde, porque anda en un carro destartalado... bueno, no todos: uno de los mejores escritores argentinos nos cuenta acá por qué el ex presidente uruguayo no le simpatiza para nada. Marcelo Birmajer * Mi primer problema con Pepe Mujica es que no le entiendo nada cuando habla. Habla con la boca cerrada. Arrastra las palabras como si no quisiera soltarlas, como un jugador de ajedrez que se queda con la ficha en la mano porque teme dejarla en tal o cual casillero y eterniza el movimiento, enervando al contrincante. Me pasa con él como con las películas españolas en la televisión, que solo las entiendo con subtítulos. Pero a Mujica no lo subtitulan, lo aplauden, aunque estoy seguro de que quienes lo aplauden tampoco entienden lo que dice. Lo aplauden porque tiene pinta de pobre, porque tiene un perro con tres patas, porque no tiene la menor relevancia en el mundo; pero en ningún caso

Partidos políticos sordos, ciegos y usurpadores

Miguel Henrique Otero Con sólidos argumentos políticos y legales, a los que cabe sumar otros provenientes del más elemental sentido común, organizaciones no partidistas, académicas, especializadas y autónomas, expertos de indiscutible calificación, y también veteranos políticos y otros en ejercicio -muchos de los cuales han sido críticos con relación a ciertos aspectos relativos a la gestión del gobierno interino- expresaron en días recientes que la decisión de una mayoría de la Asamblea Nacional de sustituir la figura del presidente encargado, ejercida hasta ahora por Juan Guaidó Márquez, para reemplazarla por la de una especie de gobierno parlamentario es un error. Un grave error que, para peor, no tiene antecedentes en el desempeño republicano de Venezuela. Hay que considerar, como primera cuestión, tal como hace el impecable comunicado que el Bloque Constitucional de Venezuela publicó el 24 de diciembre, que la usurpación se mantiene. Que Venezuela no ha dejado de estar en una situ

Una izquierda de derecha

Lluis Bassets Así como hay una derecha suicida, también hay una izquierda ignorante. Nada sabe ni nada quiere aprender del pasado. Tampoco sabe que la guerra sucede a la política cuando la política deja de funcionar. Ni que la paz, tan deseada, no llega por un clamor convocatorio, sino porque quien vence en la guerra tiene poder y pericia para imponer un orden más justo, de forma que nadie utilice la fuerza de nuevo para resolver los contenciosos inevitables que se producen entre países y gobiernos. Ignora que la Unión Soviética fue el mayor imperio europeo, y quizás del mundo, entre 1945 y 1991.  Y que lo fue bajo la flagrante mentira de la patria socialista, defensora universal del proletariado.  O que las libertades europeas se mantuvieron y se mantienen en la mitad del continente, al igual que en 1945 se recuperaron de la invasión hitleriana, gracias a la alianza con Estados Unidos. Cree los embustes de Putin sobre la mayor catástrofe del siglo XX, que no fue la desaparición de la